MUHAMMAD IFTIKHAR versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
The Constitution of Sections 30 and 10 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional petition under the Gore Moor Food Scheme was allotted to the original allottees, they were given possession, they were given proprietary rights and they included Messaging was issued after the submission of gold summons by the government and approval of the conversion of ownership in their favor, the applicants were the best buyers of the said land from the original allottees of the land. Land was resumed from the original land after the Board, Revenue Order. The congressional deadline in favor of them was also canceled, the applicants who had purchased good from the original allottees were also unknowingly condemned as they were never taken notice of in relation to the allotted land. The title of the original Allies was complete and they were able to convey the same message to the applicants. After the Board of Revenue concluded that the original Allies had acquired the land, the sources of fraud could not affect the title of the applicants they acquired when such title was granted in the Official Allotment of Powers. The added powers were available only to the authorities under Section 30 (2) of the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act, 1912, which retained the title of suit land by the Government and said that the transfer would give more buyers to the land. Powers could not be exercised after the land was conveyed, and they would also be used by the Government under section 30 (2) of the colonies. Without even giving them a chance to hear, without practicing the options. Terming the Land (Punjab) Act, 1912 as a violation of natural justice, illegal and unlawful
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Sangla Hill lawyer