IQBAL HUSSAIN versus IQBAL MASOOD
Section 16, 19, 20, 24 and O VII, R 2 The suit for recovery of the money The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the accused in the place of application for being a permanent resident of District J, the defendants were permanently resident. And were doing business and working. The K and the movable premises for which the claim was paid by the claimant were allegedly sued by the defendants because the plaintiff was also charged in the suit for the circumstances. Therefore, in light of the provisions of Section 16, K should have been filed. & 20, CPC Section 19, CPC provided that a lawsuit could be filed at the place where the reasons for the action were received and where the defendant resided on the premises or was working on the business or Plaintiffs cannot sue for acting in private, they can legally prosecute defendants at this place. Just because he was a permanent resident of the place because there was no cause for action
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Punch lawyer