Find a Lawyer

SYED ALI IMAM RIZVI versus ALL PAKISTAN TEXTILE MILLS ASSOCIATION

Section 21 Owners of specific performance of a personal service contract and under the law it is not possible for a servant to order a servant against an undesirable owner that the servant is still in his service The servant cannot be called upon his master. That he was always entitled to say that he was prepared to pay a fine for the breach of the service contract, but would not accept the servant's services for personal services as required by section 21 of the Special Relief Act, 1877 (B) shows, especially not required for its implementation, Section 21 (b) of the Special Relief Act, 1877, referred to for such agreement Section 21 (a) of the Act was inadmissible because it provided that a non-performing contract in which the substantial amount of monetary compensation could not be awarded was in particular. Implementation Where there is a contract between a master and a servant, the master is willing to pay and the servant is willing to offer personal services, it is clear that the money makes the nsation a complete relief, as all his servants are under contract. Deserved, could the breach of contract on his pay only give rise to two reliefs. Disadvantages or Specific Performance If certain performance restrictions are the only relief damages that an employer rewards to employing the servant in violation of his contract, then the only right remaining on the servant. He was entitled to the damages and the decree was to be given only to give it power of attorney advocate Khanpur lawyer