Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ALLAH BAKHSH versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD


Claims for exclusion of Articles 13 and 36 were dismissed on 28 7 1990 for lack of premature legislation in the relevant period, after the Punjab Pre-UK Ordinance 1990 came into force. Was filed by the plaintiffs on 30 9 1990. The trial court accepted the plea and reinstated the case, but the appellate court applied for the restoration of the case in view of the provisions of section 36 (2) of the Punjab Pre-Ordinance Ordinance 1990 relating to the limitation of the trial court's validity. The order for admission has been fixed for sixty days. And said that a period of sixty days would be counted from the date when the Punjab Preparation Ordinance, 1990 came into force, under which section 36 (2), the request for restoration of the case was terminated on 27 6 1990. The Impression Ordinance, 1990. Filed September 30, 1990, it was not bound by the time limit and was appropriately dismissed by the appellate court.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Kundina lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.