LAL versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SAHIWAL AND ANOTHER
Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), section 161 in its case, the suit challenged the orders passed by the revenue authorities under which the plaintiff's allotment in connection with Ihata was canceled and The commissioner canceled Ihata's allotment on a name dispute. After witnessing all the legal rituals, including hearing the parties' lengthy arguments, the harmony orders stated that the revenue authorities are strictly bound by the law and according to the facts of the case. There was no illegal or material misconduct by the orders when they were approved. These orders were further challenged before the Board of Revenue, but it resorted to the Civil Court Trial Court's rejection of the plaintiff's claim that the Revenue Authorities had passed the law in a lawful manner and were not void. Nor illegal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
