PIR MAQSOOD HUSSAIN SARHANDI versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU
Reference to Section 616161 National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Sections 10 and 18 of the Accountability Court, which dealt with the transportation of wheat in violation of the law, illegal and unlawful gain and significant loss to the public exchequer. His request was canceled and the applicant's case was no different when the original defendant was contracted. Administrative Instructions, Violations That Can Be Delegated Through Administrative and Departmental Procedures Courts will not admit to violations of such administrative instructions Courts may admit violations of the law and in any case in the present case, prosecution witnesses There was no violation. The evidence was relied upon to state that neither the government had been harmed nor the contractor had been given any unlawful benefit by the accused, in this case there was no violation of law nor any legal obligation. Litigation has been imposed by any of the accused / applicants in which the court may. The proceedings against the applicants pending the reference, the accountability court for reference has been canceled.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
