MUHAMMAD SHAHID versus THE STATE
Section 161616 A panel code (XLV of 1860), section 392/34 The custody of the case property on the superintendent of the applicant was stated to be the original owner of the property for which he was robbed, in which case the trial began shortly. It was unlikely that the applicant had started his work. When the articles submitted by the trial court prosecution did not object to the applicant's return to the said articles, in the circumstances, Superdeginama was instructed to return the lost property to the applicant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Abdul Hakim lawyer
