Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

BAZ MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE


Definitions of Evidence 302/324/34 of the Claims One of the prosecution's witnesses did not support the prosecution's case and stated before the court that he did not witness the incident. Presence was suspected and opposed to conflicting content. In its statement before the court, the FIR and it did not support the prosecution's case, but apart from interest, ocular evidence also faced material contradictions and conflicted with medical evidence. Neither the investigation nor their names were disclosed. The complainant was not a trusted person because he had given a bristling version at various stages; no other circumstantial evidence had been collected through the prosecutor's record that It was revealed that the parties were the culprits. The prosecution has failed to bring home the accused. They were acquitted of the charge

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.