Find a Lawyer

BAZ MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

Definitions of Evidence 302/324/34 of the Claims One of the prosecution's witnesses did not support the prosecution's case and stated before the court that he did not witness the incident. Presence was suspected and opposed to conflicting content. In its statement before the court, the FIR and it did not support the prosecution's case, but apart from interest, ocular evidence also faced material contradictions and conflicted with medical evidence. Neither the investigation nor their names were disclosed. The complainant was not a trusted person because he had given a bristling version at various stages; no other circumstantial evidence had been collected through the prosecutor's record that It was revealed that the parties were the culprits. The prosecution has failed to bring home the accused. They were acquitted of the charge solicitors from Saidu Sharif lawyer