Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFFAR KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 324 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (1) (b) and (ii) Defining the evidence The police officer did not say anything about the crime, but other recovery witnesses It is reported that three minor offenses have been recovered from the scene, the statements of the complainant and the prosecution witness were in conflict with each other in connection with the vacancy recovery. The police officer, who was the star witness in the matter at the time, was different from the police station section HO, which was a case against the suspects of the suspects where the incident took place. It is important to take advantage of such doubts. He sentenced the accused. And the accused was punished in which he took advantage of the doubt and was ordered to be released. list of supreme court advocates from FR Peshawar lawyer