Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus THE STATE

Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (c), Order 25 and 51 (Enforcement), Arts 3/4 bail, while the accused's grant was seized Was in control. The existence of bitterness or illicit desire for 2kg of weighed chords between the accused and the local police was not disclosed so as to falsely implicate the police in the case under section 103, CCP provisions. Accuse Section 25 of the Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, under section 103, without any substances of the CRPC, was prohibited in the grant of bail in section 51 (1) of the Narcotic Materials Nar H Act 1997. The case for attaining the provisions of Section 9 (c) of the Invoice of Anti-Drugs Act 1997 was already submitted after the investigation was completed and the police charged that the crime was justified on the basis of Prima's reason. Has happened. Able to believe the accused's involvement in the crime, his request for bail was dropped top advocate from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer