SYED ASIF ALI versus THE STATE
Sections 302, 365 and 324/34 guarantees of Section 497 Expeditionary Code (XLV of 1860), the defendants' grants were continuously detained for more than five years and on this basis they were entitled to bail on the basis of any evidence available except the statement of the complainant. There was no involvement of the accused in the case, the complainant's evidence was not credible as the prosecutor failed to identify the accused in the identification parade which had never happened, was not charged, with the crime case and case Was attached Further investigation is needed against them. The question is whether the accused were dangerous, frustrated and hardened, and would need to be considered only if the prosecution had succeeded in prosecuting them, and the defendants would have been allowed bail conditions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Haripur lawyer