Find a Lawyer

RIFFIQAT HUSSAIN versus SULTAN AHMAD

Section 2 (a) and 5 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VIII, R II Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicants Ex-authorization, Use of suit property in urban limits Supreme Court decision Haji Rana Mohammed Shabbir Ahmed Khan v. Government of Punjab province reported that SC1 applicable suit properties were purchased as PLD 1994 in 2 11 1993 and 13 12 1993 respectively, on 27 199 1994 by vendor under O VII, R. Application was filed. 11 Depending on the decision of the Supreme Court, to reject the plea on the ground that the property is within the city limits and there is no pre-emptive right under section 2 (a) of the Punjab Pre-Empty Act, 1991 Hue, Section 2 of the Punjab Preparation Act, 1991, was declared inviolable for the integration of the Islam Trial Court and at the same time the Appellate Court rejected the reliance decision by the former ambassador. ? Such date was to have effect on 31 199 1993, as such date was stated in accordance with the provisions of Article 203D (2) of the Supreme Court Constitution decision and the sale did not affect both the dates and the provisions of section 2 (a). ? The Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, when the promoter had no pre-ownership rights in the dates of the sale process, was not enforced, creating a pre-emption right in connection with the sale of suit properties. Had not happened, the courts below the order approved by both were without legal jurisdiction and were set aside, in which case the case was dismissed. patent advocate from Khoski lawyer