Find a Lawyer

SALEEM ULLAH versus JAVED AKHTAR

Section & Su Pre-pre-arrest question is whether the transaction was a sale or exchange The plaintiff claimed that in fact the suit was actually a sale / sale of the land but the defendant, in advance, filed a lawsuit. With the doctrine of withholding, the only issue for the defendant's exchange was that he had approved the registered exchange dive, exchanging his land with the suit land, the plaintiff presented no direct and positive evidence in this case. Was unable to make that the parties involved in the transaction had a sale issue and collectively gave the same color of exchange. There was no record on the date, day, time, place and nature of the negotiations between the two countries' land exchanges. The fact that any costs were settled and paid by the defendant and the person in whose presence his payment was proved also did not prove that the plaintiff appealed from such wrongdoing. There is a serious reflection on the issue of, in the circumstances, it was rightly found that the responses were in the nature of an exchange and not a sale. , But neither in the plaintiff nor in any of the plaintiffs, was able to prove the exact day, date and time when he learned of the deal and the trade. Even if the suspicion about the Talib Mu publication was not the standard that the plaintiff's plaintiff needed to prove, in the circumstances, it did not meet the needs of the students. online advocate from Risalpur lawyer