Find a Lawyer

CHAUDHARY MUNIR AHMAD versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, NAROWAL PRESIDED BY THE DISTRICT JUDGE,

Section 5 Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2000, R70 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal of the Nazim and Deputy Nazim Parties, during the approval of the Election Petition, unanimously re-counting the votes of the six polling stations In the presence of The re-counting of six polling stations was initiated, but after counting the votes of the five polling stations, the parties agreed to give up the re-counting of the sixth polling station, yet the re-counting resulted in the return of candidates. The lead was reduced, but it was still successful. The election request was rejected and the result of the returning candidate was declared as the successful candidate, as neither the six polling station votes nor the five polling was stopped. After the counting of the stations' votes, raise any objection by filing any file Had gone In this regard, the applicant at a later stage could not raise the objection to the order on which consent is ordered. The counting of votes of the sixth polling station was stopped. It was illegal that the applicant did not hold back on his words. Could be removed and could not claim a case judgment on merit after dismissing the election petition as a result of recount. The applicant's verbal claim that it was not sufficient to record that the decision of the electoral tribunal on the basis of actual record was wrong, in the event of any unlawful interference of the Election Tribunal's order, in its constitutional Scope use cannot be interfered with by the High Court. online advocate from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer