Find a Lawyer

WAPDA, WAPDA HOUSE, LAHORE versus IFTIKHAR ASLAM GORAYA

Notes Claim Notice Suits Claiming for the Recovery of Electricity Dues as Section 42 Power Act (IX of 1910), Section 554 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Sections 80, 81 and 91 of Land Revenue I challenged the demand notice issued by the Authority Demand Notice for the declaration of the plaintiffs consumer which was not submitted by the plaintiff concerned due to the lawsuit and proceedings and the importance of the said notice cannot be ignored or ignored. As the relevant information may be disclosed and the import and application of documents produced by the claimant are also used Vata, which was considered by the courts as the primary conformity in granting an order in favor of the plaintiff's objection to the authority as the matter was not decided to be retained. In the initial stage, no evidence was needed for the decision to uphold the court suit and only the relevant provisions of the LL Act, 1910 and the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 had to be considered in the present judgment and the court's order The High Court set aside because it was not sustainable. pakistani advocates Ghuzdar lawyer