ASGHAR ALI RANDHAWA versus MODERN MARINE SERVICES (PVT.) LTD
OVI, R 17 The Special Relief Act (I of 1877), the suit for the declaration of section 42 plaintiff's modification, sought a modification of the case so as to correct the clarification regarding the number of measles property and the correct description. Sub-edit should also be made in view of Despite the trial court's assertion that the proposed amendment cannot alter the nature of the suit in any way, and that no alternative action can be taken for any reason, the request for amendment to the plaintiff's observations has been dismissed because the proposed Even after the amendment, some of the claimant's parties will consist of assurances that conflict with the amended provisions. The plaintiff's trial court made observations even without reading the request for amendment filed in the trial court, in which case, OI, R 17, served in violation of the provisions of CPC while modifying the plaintiff. 'S request was deleted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Wan Radha Ram lawyer