Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DITTA versus MURAD

Section 12 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Article 113 suit for the specific performance of the contract was filed 15 years later in which the alleged sale of the property in question was executed and the plaintiff had such The explanation offered for the delay was not taken from the record suit. Although the time set forth in Article 113 of the Limitation Act 1908 will not be banned, the false application taken to file the case 15 years later was suspected to be true of the version presented by the plaintiff. The court excluded the hearing on the ground that the plaintiff could not. Proceed to deal with it, prove the execution of the sale, dismiss the judgment and decision which the trial appellate court approved by the trial court, without considering the evidence on record by the appellant. Placing wrong judgment on wrong decision did not keep the decision and the High Court set aside the appellate court's order while rejecting the trial, the trial court's order was restored. immigration advocates from Chilas lawyer