MUHAMMAD HAYAT versus FATEH MUHAMMAD
The applicant, who also barred the petition for delay in filing the Section 5 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), delayed the filing of the Section 115 amendment, also filed an application for delayed concession under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908 In which they said they could not file. The applicant's statement regarding his illness was public in nature, because he did not mention the nature of his illness, nor could he deny his right to other aspects of his term because of such a general statement. Can only be accepted. Even if the limitation was expired, otherwise the request for amendment did not apply to section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the petition for delay was dismissed, and as a result, the revision request which was time-barred Was also excluded.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Issa Khel lawyer
