SHAIKH ABDUL REHMAN versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE
Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XXXXX, R 1 & O XLIII, R 3 The applicant for the provision of a temporary injunction for the specific performance of the suit contract allegedly referred to the contract for sale of the house The suit filed with the plaintiff, along with this case, was filed for a temporary injunction under OXXIX, R1, by the CPC plaintiff, who was the defendant's tenant. The lawsuit was filed during a petition filed by the landlord seeking the removal of the application filed against them. Withdrawal proceedings were to be done by the controller through various jurors, while the specific performance of the contract was to be dealt with by the civil court plaintiff while maintaining the withdrawal proceedings against them on the basis of the alleged sale agreement. Could not be resisted. Verity or otherwise the oral agreement and the resulting effect will be decided freely by the civil court because no sale proceedings were made in favor of the plaintiff. No lawsuit was filed by him, the balance of the facility was not in favor of the plaintiff's rent controller when he instructed the plaintiff to vacate the underlying property, if the plaintiff had been denied it. There will be irreparable harm to the Plaintiff if the Plaintiff did not even issue it. Notice to Defendants Required Under O XLIII, R 3, CPC to Appeal Against R.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Khair Pur lawyer