Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD LATIF versus SHAH MUHAMMAD

OI, R 10, O XXXII, R 7 & O XLI, R 23 The Special Relief Act (I of 1877), the enforcement of the parties for the specific performance of the Section 12 suit agreement, the defendants / vendors provided statements on their statement Has received a total amount of consideration. And the claim that the claim filed by the claimant was postponed for orders on such statement After the date of hearing was adjourned, a petition was filed by a person / forerunner who I was claiming that the defendant / seller had already entered a court. Prior to the sale agreement with the claimant sellers, the suit was for sale of the land and the case between the claimant and the defendants was collective and the request was granted and an amended application was filed. I was included as appellant as the defendants and new cases were set up and it was found that the defendants had agreed to enforce the contract through the vendors, but the trial court did not claim that the contract was a claim. Can be made between the respondents / vendors and the appellants / applicants involved or Was executed through the sale process but the suit filed by the defendant's shopkeepers ruled that the appellants decided without considering the fact of the seller's agreement between the defendants / sellers and the appellants. An appeal was filed against the order. The trial court appellants kept a certified copy record of the plaintiff in connection with the trial that the appellant allegedly defended / defendant for the performance of the contract between them. registration advocate from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer