KHALID MASOOD versus FAROOQ AHMAD
Section 12 (2) and A. XXXVII, Rr 2, 3 For the purpose of recovering the amount, the dismissal of the application under section 12 (2), CPC, without framing the case and confirming the evidence. Without engaging a lawyer, the application was submitted to defend and defend the case, which was subject to the grant of a surety bond, in the form of a conditional order from the applicant. A lawsuit was filed for failure to comply with the petitioner's request that he never consulted. In favor of the petition, affidavit and his lawyer, the Power of Attorney compared the signatures of the petitioner's acknowledged signatures to the record, which almost matched each other that the applicant's request was He was never served, nor has he advised his lawyer to prosecute. Nor did the trial court make any application before it was absolutely unreasonable and unreasonable, so that the trial court gave good reasons for excluding the petitio to avoid the consequences of the order. In the present case, the application for the data under section 12 (2) of the CPC dispute has been resolved by the document itself. The High Court dismissed the request for review with costs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Khangarh lawyer