Find a Lawyer

MST. FAIZ ELAHI versus SYED BASHIR ALI SHAH

For the gift of the Sections 42, Sections 122 and 123 Registration Act (XVI of 1908), Sections 172 and 49 of the Property Act (IV of 1882), the assertion of the plaintiff was claimed to be exclusive on the suit land on this basis. Was the owner. The Tamalek (Gift) was run by his father in his custody and the change of inheritance passed in favor of the defendants was illegal and ineffective, under which the plaintiffs' courts rejected the adjoining claim that the plaintiff's rights I was proved to be a Tamil author and that according to Islamic law, a valid gift can be made orally and if the writing does not require registration, then the authentic Tamil name is allegedly executed in favor of the plaintiff. Being a registered document, it will not create any right in favor of the plaintiff because under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908 And under 49 the gift process must be registered. immigration advocate from Sadiqabad lawyer