SAJJAD versus THE STATE
The testimony of section 2302 was promptly filed in the Broad Wright incident in which only one victim was charged with the accused person, who has been charged by the accused complainant and the prosecution witness even though he was the victim. There were sons and nephews, but they could not be termed as an enemy against the accused. As interesting witnesses, the court had to look at the quality of the evidence and not the amount of evidence. The ocular account was fully endorsed by medical evidence and there was no reason for the accused to be falsely involved by the complaining party, who put the deceased son and a close relative dead. The defendants will likely not be forgiven, and after the prosecution has proven their case against the accused, the trial court will go beyond any shadow of a doubt, conviction and sentence against it. Was not made to be a proof.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer
