Find a Lawyer

ABDUL QAYYUM versus THE STATE

Sections 666/7 7 evidence No cases of unknown persons were observed, the prosecution's case was related only to cases involving extra-judicial confession, judicial confession and recovery in which the accused was used in the alleged extra-judicial confession. Prior to the prosecution's testimony, it was repeated and no detailed account was given, alleged extra-judicial confession was made before the prosecutor's witness a week after the alleged arrest, other prosecution witnesses The victim's cousin, who has identified the victim's body, did not support the prosecution. The extent of the offense of confession of the accused because he had said on oath that no confession had been committed by the accused before, cannot be believed, under the circumstances allegedly before the magistrate, Section 64164, The confessional statement made under the CR by the PC showed that the magistrate had recorded it under oath which provided proof that the statement was inadmissible the same day the confession of the three accused was recorded by the magistrate. Who did not ask the suspect about the date of his arrest and whether he was tortured by the police or not by the magistrate The action was not. Acknowledge that the suspect was not handed over to the police after the confessional crime, the recovery witness was not only a close relative of the deceased, but he was also not a resident of the location, various witnesses at the time of the recovery process. Statement, which are material contradictions. The location could not be neglected was surrounded by other restoration homes, but no one from the neighborhood law firms from Qalandarabad lawyer