Find a Lawyer

AZIZ ULLAH KHAN versus THE STATE

Definitions of Sections 2302 and 2 452 were the father of the complainant and the witnesses were brothers of the incident in the house where they all lived with the complainant and the prosecution witness was the natural witness of the incident. An FIR was filed with the fact that the presence of the complainant and the prosecution witnesses was neither unnatural nor unusual, and all of them had no serious animosity or serious illness or bitterness. There was no background so that they could be immediately affected. Witnesses made consistent statements to falsely implicate such a case, and their credibility could not be shaken during their cross-examination, and their statements implied confidence that the purpose of the incident. It was sufficiently proved that the crime was recovered from the scene of the incident. After the incident and the pistol were completely recovered from the possession of the suspects, they were sent to the forensic science laboratory, and the laboratory report confirmed that the crime was cleared by exporting the pistol from the suspect's possession, Medical evidence confirmed the incident, the use of weapons and the whereabouts of the injuries. The ocular account went a long way in providing circumstantial evidence, supporting the statements of eyewitnesses, the prosecutor succeeding in proving his case against the accused beyond any reasonable doubt. In a very despicable way of doing this, he showed a disappointment over a small dispute in his own home over a small sum of Rs. 2,000, a trial sentence. us immigration advocates from Rawalpindi lawyer