MUHAMMAD IRSHAD versus EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SHAHDARA DIVISION, LAHORE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD
Section 22 Electric Connection, Preventing Defaults in Payment of Premises Electrical Charges, which the Appellant had already implemented, we contracted, negotiated the sale and appealed the powers pending approval. The power connection with the holder was withheld The petition filed by the appellant against the Act of the authorities was dismissed by the petitioner's request that the transferor own the transfer. Accepted the transfer as the, and thus initiates the recovery process against the transferor who accepted the transfer. Was called Impact of not owning and occupying the disputed premises After their own admission, authorities were refusing to raise the demand against the appellant. The authorities could only receive the remaining amount due to electrical energy from the owner or occupier. It is not allowed to roam around and re-fit the tire smell in any neck in the High Court that it is necessary for the tire authorities to identify their defaulters and to recover the dues from such defaulters in accordance with the law, in the present case. , Appellant judges were not considered justified in preventing approval of the industrial connection. By a single judge, the process of stopping the power supply to the High Court was set aside, an act beyond the authority of the authority was allowed to appeal the intra-court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Kalar Syedian lawyer