Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus THE STATE

Section 2302 / Anti 34 Anti Terrorism Act (XI XXVII of VI 1997 XX XX), the testimony version of Section 7 evidence, is that at midnight some unidentified persons committed the murder of the complainant's husband and his granddaughter. The incident was not believed and during the interrogation the widow and her alleged permorteur were found responsible for the murder, but no direct evidence of the incident was found, the trial court's decision restored the entire prosecution. The wind, the last seen evidence, was not of that quality, which can be relied upon to pass a verdict in a murder case. It showed that each deceased person has enough to cause an injury and there is no need to inflict any injuries on his person, the prosecution did not explain the need for constant hitting on the deceased persons. And said he was hurt after his suffering. Evidence of the alleged theft of a knife from a person involved in a sewer outside a D's home was also easily obtained from the suspect in the kitchen of his home, who was not in his exclusive possession after the incident, hardly Hardly appealed because of the extra-judicial confession evidence did not plead because Motivi claimed to have committed the murder of her husband. Not having a pleasant relationship with him, but in the absence of any such evidence on record, the evidence of the motive did not come to the rescue of the prosecution from the evidence because of the injuries caused by the accused. The explanation does not exist as shown by its medico. Legal Report Any of the prosecution female advocates from Shangla lawyer