Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ versus MUHAMMAD MUZAFFAR

Under the renovation for possession of Section 26 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), sections 9 and 115 jurisdictional civil suit, the purchase of land from the defendants was not included in the Revenue Record, thus, the defendants The plaintiffs were allotted land in the name of the plaintiff. The plaintiff's trial court found that the suit proceedings on the ground of a defendant's admission found that the suit was actually sold by the defendants, but section 26 of the Appeal of the West Pakistan Consolidation Holdings Ordinance, 1960 This case has been withheld. The court ruled in the appeal filed by the defendants. The court's inquiry found that the land in which the suit land was allotted to the plaintiffs was sold by them to the plaintiff, in which case a simple and straightforward question of title was raised. The decision to grant possession by the Civil Court was to follow such title by the following courts. It is wrong to admit that the contentious decision has led to any interference within the four corners of section 115 of the CPC High Court. Did not demand. tax advocates from Kunjah lawyer