Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

The Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 93 (2) constitutes the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (OFXV of 2000), issuing a formal notice of demand for tax recovery by the Section 9 Tax Recovery Officer, and this That it had already received a warning letter from the Commissioner. In this regard, the department's response to the complainant in the Income Tax was recorded 98 record from 92 to 1997 of 1991, which also shows that There are outstanding dues. During all these years it was said that the arrears could not be recovered nor otherwise fixed, which would indicate that the affairs of the Circle were not monitored as well as supervised by the superior officers. Absolute absence was also in fact one that could be easily contacted by the bank employee and then the fact that the inspecting Additional Commissioner and the Commissioner of Income Tax could be found in his constituency in large circles to prevent any tax demand. The fact that it was considered routine to have regular meetings to discuss arrears Instead of collecting the demand for a few years without finding out its status, it was paid for free. One advantage of such meetings was that all such fraudulent arrears where the demand was set aside or reduced or paid, effective measures were taken to recover the arrears which It was found that the Revenue Division was once again asked to pay due attention to the problems resulting from the lack of oversight and to pay proper attention to resolving the complainant's complaint in this regard and the relevant concern. top advocate from Gojra lawyer