MESSRS KHYBER SPINNING MILLS, GADOON versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Federal Tax Ombuds Ordinance 2000 Section 9 (2) (a) The terms, functions and powers of the Office of the Exclusion of the Federal Tax Ombudsman were established that the matter should be a matter of judgment before a court, tribunal. Or the authority on the date that the application was made under the establishment of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 authority failed to satisfy the appeal for leave of appeal so that the decision of the High Court in the Supreme Court. Has been challenged. The complaint was filed on 31st 2001, when the authority moved and directed the Supreme Court to file an appeal on 16th 2002 and in their own appeal it was not claimed that the complaint was filed before the Federal Federal Government. The tax was presented to the Ombudsman. It was asked to state in clear terms and to provide proof whether the appeal for leave to appeal was filed in the Supreme Court, but they were unaware and would not provide any details or from the same jurisdiction. Any information about the related object was misunderstood in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Mir Ali lawyer