Find a Lawyer

SULTAN MUHAMMAD versus SECRETARY, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD

Customs Act 1969 Section 19 Sales Tax Act (VII VI of 1990), Section 13 (l) Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000V), Sections 9 & 10 (3) Pakistan Afghanistan Transit Trade Agreement, 1965, Date 2 3 1965 Section RO No. 1162 (I) / 94, Dated 21 1 1994 (21 12 1994) Section RO No. 109 (I) / 95, Dated 13 12 1995 (13 2 1995) Section RO No. 368 (I) / 95, dated 2-5 1995 Rules of Business, 1973 Directed by the Chief Executive, 1 1 2000 General Powers for Exemption of Customs Duty The goods were released despite the Supreme Court's decision on the delay and the direction issued by it. Insisted on not doing so. Petitions / complaints of chief executive integrity were filed when complainants in the war-torn region of Afghanistan learned of the chief executive's directive when the goods were released allowing facts and the circumstances of the case to be extended. Was not a matter of justification and delay. One of the businessmen's common but internet-related sovereignty agreements that included goodwill and relations at the government level, inappropriate behavior of the Department of Customs and the Central Board of Revenue, in violation of the Supreme Court's decision and Insist on not releasing the goods on clear violation of chief executive. The Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended the Central Board of Revenue implement the chief executive's directive and issue the goods to complainants / applicants within three weeks from the date of decision. family advocate from Daska lawyer