Find a Lawyer

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus AKHTAR JAVED

The objections to the appeal on appeal against the merits of section 156 (1) 9, 14, 77, 81, 82, 178, 185 F&185G Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 417, were objected to by the fact that it Filed was ineligible. When the lawyer was not authorized to file an appeal by the federal government, it was alleged that the law officer appointed under the Central Law Officers Ordinance, 1970 under section 185G of the Customs Act, 1969, was the only competent person Has filed an appeal and has already taken action. In fact, the appeal was filed by the Federal Government through the Deputy Director for the Special Appellate Court and any person, including the federal government, under section 185F of the Customs Act, 1969, was subject to the provisions of PCCs XXXI and XXXI May prefer an appeal within. Section 1717, filed within 30 days, within 30 days after the date of the special appellate court order or judgment affecting the order of acquittal from any court other than the High Court. The appeal filed under CR PC and Customs Act, 185 FF of 69 69 6969, had to be read with section 171717 (2A); CR PC was not required to appeal only by the federal or provincial government, but It may also be filed. In the present case, the affected person is the Director Intelligence and Investigation (Customs and Excise), as a provocative person, when he filed a case against the accused, he was able to file an appeal against the eviction. It was mentioned in R with its role. It was also endorsed by oral and documentary evidence that the trial court declared the verdict invalid and illegal. immigration advocates from Doltala lawyer