MUHAMMAD MAROOF ALIAS KARKHI versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (UV of 1860), section 302/324/148/149 bail, the grant of two accomplices who were the son of the accused and in this case he was designated as an active attacker, Was not arrested and was not announced. According to the police officer, the fugitive suspects are still investigating the matter whether they participated in the incident or not but the accused recovered from the incident recovered from the incident. And the alleged pistol was not recovered from Reliance accused of FIR. Circumstances, cannot be blindfolded The dispute cord (plea against the accused is not transmitted) was not available on the police record, the accused was told to be empty-handed and only Lalkar was charged. Under section 497 (2), the accused needs further investigation. The CCP, the accused, was admitted on bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Lawrence pur lawyer