Find a Lawyer

KHALID SAEED versus MRS. SHAMIM RIZWAN

Regulin 51 uses the Punjab Finance Ordinance (III of 2000), Schedule II, Item VIII Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 intra-court appeals for commercial purposes as a body talk gymnasium and health club. In the constitutional petition of the Lahore Development Authority Buildings Regulations, 1984, the respondent allowed the petition for use of the residential house by the Appellant in the residential area for the purposes of the Health Club and the Body Talk Gymnasium High Court and the Appellant on behalf of the Chief Minister. Permission to use has been granted. For commercial purposes, the appellant had raised that since he had paid professional tax under the provisions of Item VIII of Schedule III of Punjab Finance Ordinance 2000, he was a professional, as was the Regln of Lahore Development Authority Buildings. 51 I mentioned. Regulation, 1984 If any tax is levied on the profession of gymnasiums and health clubs, under the provisions of the Punjab Finance Ordinance 2000, such taxation would allow the applicant to operate property in the residential area for running body talk gymnasiums etc. And against the Lahore Development Authority Buildings Regulations 1984 Regulation 51, the judgment (Judges of Chambers) High Court was legal, unimaginable, dealt with every aspect of the matter and from the record and the law on this matter. The relevant facts were brought into consideration, a division bench of the High Court upheld the decision of the Chambers judge. Refused to klt. The High Court Intra-Court of Appeal was dismissed in the circumstances Pakistan, top advocate family court from Satyana Bangla lawyer