Find a Lawyer

REHMAT ALI versus MEMBER (COLONIES), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Section 30 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Jurisdiction of the Excluded Tenants Scheme, Jurisdiction of the Board of Revenue under Section 30 (2) of the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act, 1912 The applicants for deportation were refugees from the Middle East. Leading Punjab and two separate families, they were allotted land under the Gozara scheme which was later turned into an Injured Tenants Scheme necessary After the necessary formal action, the Revenue Authorities filed a petition with the Board of Revenue. Implemented a joint agreement in favor. The applicants, who had canceled the jurisdiction under section 30 (2) of the Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912, claimed that there was no fraud or misrepresentation by them; the Board of Revenue had inaccurately This convention has been declared invalid and there is no fraud. Misrepresentations were made by the applicants and they were not incapable of securing Altemi under Section 30 (2) of the NT / Land Proprietary Rights, Government Land (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912 The lack of permanent facts seeking extraordinary powers and the defining rights of the parties to the extraordinary cannot be interfered with. Unjustified Accusations The Board of Revenue acted without any jurisdiction to withdraw the proprietary rights of applicants and to cancel the Convention Deadline, and the order passed by the Board of Revenue was illegal and without legal effect. And the same constitutional application was allowed in the circumstances us immigration advocates from Matiari lawyer