BRIG. (RETD.) FARRAKH HUSSAIN SHAH versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, LAHORE
Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application nomination papers, defaulting on bank loan default The determination of the claim for recovery of the bank loan has been stated in the column of liability itself. The money was outstanding against him and his wife's Returning Officer accepted the nomination papers, but on appeal filed by a voter, the appellate tribunal rejected the candidate's papers on the basis of the default playlist taken by the candidate. Candidates are not expected to be bank defaulters, according to the bank filed with the rehabilitation trial A copy of the lawsuit in the suit filed by the bank shows that the candidate and his partners are required to file a permanent bankruptcy lawsuit, along with the nomination papers attached to the nomination, the candidate gave a false statement Whether a loan of more than Rs 2 lakh was not owed against him or any concern that he owned had six partners in the firm, the candidate and his wife would be considered primarily owners of the concern and that was the whole reason. Of the liabilities, the applicant owns 33% of the liability against himself and his wife. Four of the liabilities will be from the partners that each candidate, in the present case, was not only a bank loan debtor but also declared a nomination in the nomination form; the High Court refused to interfere in the decision. Deleted under circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Domeli lawyer