Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM versus ABDUL HAQ

Section 2 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Informed Officer Full or Correct Details Exit appeal scope issue was a pending matter at the time of elimination rules Provincial Government appointed all Assistant Commissioners. In their respective areas, the matter was decided by the Assistant Commissioner as a notification officer under the provisions of the Disapproved Property and Displaced Persons Act (1975) while the Assistant Commissioner while deciding the matter. The notification officer did not mention his full position as respondent. Appeals to the Additional Commissioner (Revenue), who rejected the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, and held that the order passed by the Revenue Side to give the details of his full or correct designation was different. No, because the Assistant Commissioner was otherwise. The relevant powers had and have been informed that the doctrine taken by the Additional Commissioner was completely unnecessary by law; no appeal was before the Additional Commissioner against the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner as notified. The officer's remedy was the formation of a law and unless it was provided by law, it could not be, even if the Additional Commissioner found any stain on the order unlawful, even though the party lacked jurisdiction. Elsewhere, legally, should have stopped taking advantage because Additional Commissioner R (revenue) was done without any jurisdiction. The appeal was to enjoy and accept the appeal and its ruling was without legal authority power of attorney advocate Skardu lawyer