ZILA COUNCIL, LAHORE versus REHM DIL KHAN
Appointment without notice to the appellant for sections 8, 20 and 39, the original record does not reveal that the service of the appellant has been affected, the date of the power of attorney filed by the appellant to this day. After which the arbitrator was appointed. The appellant was not authorized by the competent authority to appear before the court. The trial court passed the order of appointment of arbitrator without any appellant. No one should be punished by the act of the court. The service has not been affected by the appointment of the appellant. The arbitrator was obliged to present the notice to the appellant under the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940, without the legal authority, the order of appointment of the arbitrator was passed without notice, in violation of the principles of natural justice. Was, the request of the defendant for the appointment of arbitrator shall be considered pending as per the trial court appeal allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Kech lawyer
