HYDERABAD THROUGH. G. A. KHAN & ADVOCATES; KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Despite the decision to set up the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 section 2 (3) (ii) and the office of the 9th Municipal Administration Office, the High Court directed the Central Board of Revenue to decide the case according to the terms of the decision. I delayed. The directive of the Supreme Court was yet to be implemented and no basis could be laid for the failure of the Central Board Board to comply with the delay without good cause. The Central Revenue commits maliciousness in terms of yesterday (ii). What was ) The establishment of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, section 2 of section 2 (3); 2000 which was established as negligence negligence and delay in payment of duties and responsibilities - was concerned with federal taxation. The Ombudsman, after hearing the Complainant and the Department, recommended to the Central Board of Revenue to record its results in terms of the remand order approved by the superior. On or before the court date fixed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
