Find a Lawyer

MESSRS SIDDIQSONS WEAVING MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACH versus SECRETARY. REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, Customs Act 1969 Section 219 Improvement Duty Rules 1991, R6 Section RO 490 (1) / 85 dated 23 5 1985 [Amended by Section RO 432 (1) / 87] , 2000, Section 9 deferred payment facility and bank guarantees were offered against such facilities. Non-payment of installments was not broken by the customs authorities on timely bank guarantees, but the customs authorities demanded principal payment and compound surcharge for late payment after a period of six years on receipt of information from the appraisal Intelligence Branch surcharge. The bank's guarantees covered the tax liability, saying that failure to pay the first installment caused alarm and urgent action should be taken to enforce the guarantees. In fact, it was taken after six years when the appraisal intelligence branch received the information demanded by the customs authorities bank that there was no justification for the customs, demanding surcharge on the amount received and the department on surcharge from Ascii or the bank. Seeking surcharges for failure to disclose In this regard, the Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that the Central Board of Revenue be directed to the Collector of Customs to identify officials responsible for negligence and take necessary action against them. Return the security documents from the bank to the bank. Instruct the customs collector that there is no legal justification for receiving surcharges as per the requirements of the department and the notice issued to the complainant and the bank should be withdrawn / canceled. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Jandanwala lawyer