IFTIKHAR AHMED versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Establishment of offices of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 of the XXV), Section 9 Assessment Income was calculated at Rs 300,000 on the basis of the tax profile created by PRAL, while the income at Rs 30,000. Assessed in the survey form, this assessment was canceled by the Commissioner. Based on the diagnostic records for the de novo proceedings as well as the information provided by the complainant complaints, such errors were occurring in the event that the Commissioner's timely action led to an estimate. The officers were to be embarrassed and harassed by the Federal Diagnostics. The Tax Ombudsman recommends that the Central Board of Revenue should ensure that proper PRAL management is conducted with the staff under the supervision of experts.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Kotmomin lawyer
