MALIK MUHAMMAD MUMTAZ versus MALIK ABDUL RAUF
Section 21 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2), arbitration proceedings were made on the basis of fraud by setting aside such proceedings under which the respondent's plot was transferred to Section 12. The applicant had announced the purchase. (), CPC did the same to separate the award as the award was made on a fraudulent basis and was based on the fraud involved and, according to the arbitration proceedings, the plot was sold to the applicant. Was made and was one lakh ten thousand rupees. The dispute was paid in writing for a balance of just Rs 20,000 at no charge. The trial court granted the petition and set aside the award saying that the fame dispute plot is located in the middle of the city and There was no evidence that the plot was ever sold or agreed upon. The petitioner was sold to the respondents, the High Court found no error of law or fact in the trial court's order where the decision was adjourned by decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kamber Ali Khan lawyer