Find a Lawyer

MEHMOOD-UL-HASSAN BABAR KHAN versus LIAQAT ALI KARIM

Section 14 (i) (c) Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2000, R76 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 62 (d) and 1991 Constitutional Appeal The role of the candidate to hide the election assets is unresolved by election. The Tribunal alleges against the retiring candidate that at the time of filing the nomination papers, the candidate had printed his assets in Form XIX, which was in the form of a company's share certificate, the retired candidate contended that the company had total assets before. Were attached. The process of decision and decree execution by the banking court, therefore, reduced the share price or was minus the Election Tribunal, recording the evidence and allowing the election petition. As a result, the election was put aside that the returning candidate's ploy was that the Election Tribunal did not compile a case and that the candidate was treated unfairly due to non-preparation of such cases. , The returning candidate tried to revoke the charge. By presenting all oral and documentary evidence, therefore, the Election Tribunal was not subjected to prejudice by not presenting its case. Even the arrangement of the matters was not compulsory, the decision of non-issue was not sufficiently appropriate, even in a civil suit where the decision was made, in the present case, the candidate, There was no discrimination in any way. It has been found that the returning candidate has not denied the error of his own by not announcing the share certificate in his assets ie Form XIX. Candidate Self Share Certificate best advocate from Taunsa sharif lawyer