Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALID WASEEM versus MANSOOR AKBAR KOKAB, DISTRICT JUDGE/ELECTION TRIBUNAL, NAROWAL/SIALKOT

Section 14 (J) Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2000, R80 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of the petitioner and the deputy nominee of retired candidate, after the bank declared the unqualified candidates unsuccessful candidates. They were disqualified. Election candidates cast 3802 votes, while the respondents received 3593 votes, while other panels of candidates cast 21 and 107 votes respectively, while the Election Tribunal granted permission for non-payment of bank loans. Is. It was complained that an order was passed by the Banking Court against the applicant, consequently the respondents were declared candidates for withdrawal, more votes were cast than all other panels. The respondents, who were not directly contested in the elections, were aware of the applicant's disqualification, it may be safe to assume that the majority of those who voted for the applicant and his / her co-candidate were also unaware. No, the Election Tribunal did wrong with the majority of the votes, since the votes were deleted, the Election Trust The Biennale acted without legal action while announcing the respondents' approaching candidates. Using constitutional jurisdiction, the court upheld the election tribunal's order, partially upheld the applicant's choice, issued a decree to select the respondents, and deposed the deputy Nazim An exception was allowed because it was not authorized. best advocate from Kalam lawyer