Defining the evidence of Section 9 of the Drugs Act 1997, both the top officers of the Anti-Narcotic Force had full support for the prosecution's case, which had no illicit desire or hatred against the accused, for which they falsely accused the accused. And the long and exhaustive cross examination of the witnesses' statements in damaging the prosecution's story did not yield anything fruitful, from the truck's secret cavities. Illegal drugs were recovered and the driver and cleaner were on hand. The case was not prejudiced by the defendants in the trial for non-production or destruction certificate ownership of the case, which could be considered as a remedy for irregularities under most law and its recovery. The matter was substantiated and no suggestion was made. Detective officer convicted of property related to destruction certificate of the case and convicted remains in AID
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
