Find a Lawyer

FARHAT BEGUM versus SAID AHMAD SHAH

Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 12 and 42 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 54 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 117 and 120 Oral Sales Ovens Lawyer's Advocacy Advocate for Evidence Through the evidence, the plaintiff sought to declare this suit property on the basis of the oral sale made by the property owner in favor of the plaintiff and he was also given the property. The plaintiff refused the sale and presented his lawyer in the trial court instead. In such a transaction the property owner was not to appear in private and not only denied that he had made any sale deal in favor of the claimant, but also to obtain the sale consideration and the buyer's possession. The facts of the extradition were also denied. This was not done by the attorney could not confirm or deny the oral transaction between the parties as it was not present when the owner had allegedly sold the linen d. The property owner's reason for not appearing for the cause was not accepted because no attempt was made by the local commission to obtain the owner's statement of oral sale. immigration advocates phone number from Bannu lawyer