Find a Lawyer

NAUSHAD KHAN versus ROZI MUHAMMAD

Section 5 of the NWFP Pre-Emission Act 1987 Shree Nizam e Adele Regulation (I of 1999), parcels 6 and 7, which were not accepted by the parties in connection with Al Qazi's offer of a pre-emption case for possession. The case was referenced by Moin Qazi, with the consent of the parties, before the defendant submitted his award to the court, requesting that Moin Qazi not express his confidence. Such request was accepted and the order of reference was recalled, Zail Qazi accepted the plaintiff's appeal and dismissed the case. Based on the award of the Movin e Qazi Award, already filed in the trial court, the legitimate responsibility of the Musselman was entrusted to the Mavin Qazi, and also when the two parties resolved the issue through a Michelle / Mashal-e-Qazi Qazi. Did not express his consent to do so. When prompted to resolve the case of Mouvin Qazi on a law-related error, Al-Qazi had withdrawn the order of reference and canceled the Movin e-Qazi award, giving orders to proceed on the matter. It was not that the district judge, in good faith, had committed an error, not only depending on the award of the examiners but also on the rule of the court and ordered the plaintiff in an appeal against the inter-provincial order of al-Qazi. ? Only acted in breach of the relevant provisions of the law, but he immediately declared his case without ruling of al-Qazi and exceeded his jurisdiction, thereby reviewing the defendant's High Court. Accepting the request and rejecting the improper judgment / injunction. And for the eligibility decision within the stipulated time list of advocates from Talamba lawyer