Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN versus GHULAM FAIRD

Code of Conduct 1908 Section 114, O III, R 4 and O XLVII, R 1 Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules, 1976, R 166 The petition for review of the judgment was approved by the High Court against the former parties against the applicants. Since his lawyer confirmed the summons issued to him by the High Court, he is not a lawyer to defend the case on the principal seat. The review request was filed against the current applicant to set aside the decision approved in the review application. It was his duty to appear and inform his client about the date of hearing of the petition. There is no valid basis for his suggestion not to present that he was busy appearing before the High Court bench only. Appointment of a lawyer on the spot is terminated by anyone but it is evident that with the leave of the court under O III, R 4 (2), the appropriate course for counseling in CPC shall be in writing. It was to be asked to withdraw from it. E-Case High Court refuses to interfere in the decision passed against the applicant in exercise of the revised jurisdiction inheritance advocates near Kohat lawyer