GHULAM NABI, ADVOCATE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN, PRESIDENT ISLAMIC LAWYER MOVEMENT KHYBER PAKHTUNKHW versus GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA
R 5 (e) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Public Service Commission Ordinance (XI of 1978), Section 7 (1) (a) (i) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Public Service Commission (Duties) Rules, 1983, R 3 Constitution Pakistan, Arts 2A, 175 (3), 199 and 203 constitutional petitioners including civil judges, magistrates, al-Qa'az Qazi, etc., by the Provincial Cabinet to submit the summaries referred to the Committee headed by the Minister of Law, under which powers to recruit such Judicial Officers. Notification dated 5-10 2012 for retention. After the 18th Constitutional Amendment by the Public Service Commission, judges of the High Courts can be elevated on the recommendations of the Judicial Commission, headed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, with the executive officers of the subordinate judicial officers maintaining the Public Service Commission. There is no justification for retaining recruitment options. Such powers of the executive authority will make it clear that they are not ready to give full independence to the judiciary, except that they want to put their merits in the subordinate judiciary and, over time, to the High Court and the Supreme Court. Is likely to be higher. The High Court is only capable of recruiting and selecting judicial officers, not the provinces of the Public Service Commission and the Balochistan have already given such powers and powers to their respective High Courts through their respective notifications, Executive. Maintaining such powers by the authority would be equivalent to discriminating the Peshawar High Court, denying its authority and independence the constitutional petition was accepted and proceedings were declared against the provincial cabinet without any legal Of option and
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
