MURAD GUL versus THE STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR
Section 561A, 154 and 265 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), possession of a narcotic application for termination of section 9 (b) FIR, by the accused for termination of FIR accuracy Milma's intention to stop the criminal proceedings in a slip-shot manner cannot be considered without giving the Malaysian removal prosecution an opportunity to prove his case because the High Court is not investigating it using its inherent power. Whether the evidence on the record is available or not was credible because the defendant's case is already pending trial The writ was presented, so the court should be allowed to prosecute and record the testimony of the prosecution witnesses to confirm the guilt or innocence of the accused. At any stage of this case, the right to file an application for his success under section 65, K, CCPC / revocation of the right to terminate the FIR accordingly. Was gone
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
